Seaholm Power Plant

*NOTE: ALL MUSIC INCLUDED IN THE VIDEO WAS RECORDED ON SITE AT THE SEAHOLM POWER PLANT

            Seaholm Power Plant was operational from about 1950 till it was decommissioned in 1989, in part due to the detrimental environmental impact it had upon the surrounding area of Southwest Austin. Since then it’s been used as a venue for a wide variety of events such as concerts, car shows, parties, and arts exhibitions. There’s been nothing but positive feedback on using the structural space and surrounding area like this, everybody loving the unique architecture of the plant and even just the idea of using this old building that used to power the city but is now an outlet that helps to power the creativity that Austin has to provide. But in 2000 the city of Austin created a master development plan that is soon to commence, soon to create a new part of Austin dubbed the Seaholm district. The plan is to build a new high rise apartment complex, several retail stores, offices, restaurants, a public library, and an open field space that looks over Lady Bird Lake. Such vision to take a formerly industrial area and turn it into a vibrant urban space has been applauded by many supporters. But then are those that disagree, that are disappointed that it will no longer be a landmark that doubles as a space that is a great channel for the unique Austin culture to pass through. Of course then the demographics discussion begins: what kind of people are going to be in this new area and how will it affect the city. I believe that that the repurposing of the power plant into the Seaholm District is detrimental to Austin because, while it creates a municipal space while preserving the building, the plant has become known as a landmark central to Austin’s personality.

            The critics’ argument against the remodeling of the Seaholm Power Plant and surrounding space is that it will detract from the special personality of Austin. As well as this, they contend that, by ceasing to act as a concert venue, it diminishes the value of Austin as the live music capital of the world. The plant has long been present in the hearts of Austinites, its distinct red neon sign a memory for many. If not, the local icon can be found in countless photographs that attempt to capture the spirit of Austin through the sign. Seaholm’s importance as a landmark, regardless of its lack of use, is widely recognized. Proposing its demolition would be akin to suggesting that we destroy the University of Texas Tower. This is why critics, myself included, believe that the power plant should remain as it is and continue to host musicians and exhibitions alike in order for people to be able to reflect upon a historical piece of architecture while experiencing Austin’s distinct culture.

            Most supporters of the urbanization plan agree that it would be disgusting if the power plant was to be entirely demolished. But they believe that it would be more beneficial if the area where the plant is located were to transform into a modern space where people will be able to interact and live. Their argument is that this space has great potential to bring in revenue for the city without changing an existing area. Many are especially excited about the announcement of the addition of a Trader Joe’s in the Seaholm District. In addressing the loss of the music scene at the power plant, some argue that the location of the nearby venues Austin Music Hall and Austin City Limits Studio are sufficient in providing a place for the Austin music to thrive.

            No doubt the subject of what demographics will be present in this new area must be addressed. Unfortunately, I believe that the Seaholm District will come to be known as a secluded area of town that belongs to the upper class. The new residencies are targeted for the upper class, so now doubt the close by events will cater to them for their convenience. The only consolation that can be found is that it is not similar to the situation of gentrification in East Austin since there is nobody currently living in the soon-to-be neighborhood. Still, we can predict that there will be not much diversity to be seen in the Seaholm District.